Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst ... 4567 LastLast
Results 101 to 120 of 126

Thread: How Many troops coming out of BP?

  1. #101

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by napkin View Post
    ROFL.. Touche! I had a nub moment *grin*

    So yeah on that note, here are the stats for the strongest troop for each race according to the 24/7 build at level 20 klebe mentioned:

    Infantry

    Teuton - 60 Attack - 3:23 Time - 127,684 Total Troops - 7,661,040 Total Attack
    Gaul - 65 Attack -
    Roman - 70 Attack - 5:24 Time - 80,000 Total Troops - 5,600,000 Total Attack

    Cavalry

    Gaul - 140 Attack -
    Teuton - 150 Attack - 8:20 Time - 51840 Total Troops - 7,776,000 Total Attack
    Roman - 180 Attack - 9:54 Time - 43636 Total Troops - 7,854,480 Total Attack

    Totals

    Teuton Max Attack = 15,437,040
    Roman Max Attack = 13,454,480
    Gaul Max Attack =

    If anyone can give me build times for Gaul Swords and Haeds, I can update the stats..

    As I've said so far, they are still even when played by equally skilled players.. Roman Wall > Teuton Wall makes up for it.. Plus, those Roman offensive troops make a better defense than the Teuton ones..
    what infantry are you considering for teutons? because you must make your calculations with maces and not axes as maces are stronger.

    teuton wall is far better than roman wall. and come on, noone defends with off troops. however, the real strenght of the romans lie in their praetorians.

    of course its possible to play a decent role as a roman. see for instance pi ka chew from last round, who had strong enough off to kill a wonder and still applied 100 k praetorians for his own wonder. but teutons of course have much much better offs than romans generally speaking.

    the strenght of a gaul off and deff is its speed, and in case of phalanxes its price. theres unfortunately a lack of players taking advantage of the strength of thunders. people tend to build up their swords/haeduan offs, but then, why didnt they play teuton? i would always welcome a thunder specialist in an alliance, able to kill all attempts of garaging troops in the end game.
    cogito ergo cata

  2. #102

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MouthOfTGR View Post
    what infantry are you considering for teutons? because you must make your calculations with maces and not axes as maces are stronger.

    teuton wall is far better than roman wall. and come on, noone defends with off troops. however, the real strenght of the romans lie in their praetorians.
    Maces = 40 Attack
    Axes = 60 Attack

    Link: http://help.travian.com/index.php?type=faq&mod=430

    I know no one defends with offensive troops.. Was just saying if it were to happen the Romans would be better off..

  3. #103

    Default

    I believe the strength is not in the pixels on your computer. It is in your neuron cells in your brain.

  4. #104
    New Poster
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    30

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by napkin View Post
    Maces = 40 Attack
    Axes = 60 Attack

    Link: http://help.travian.com/index.php?type=faq&mod=430
    But maces have more attack/build time, so if you're figuring out how quickly you can build an offensive army, you should use maces not axes.

  5. #105

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by napkin View Post
    I do stick to facts friend No reason to start bashing each other like immature idiots.. Please see my previous post..
    I posted that before you made that post. But seeing as you did, I'll take back what I said.

    Quote Originally Posted by napkin View Post
    Maces = 40 Attack
    Axes = 60 Attack

    Link: http://help.travian.com/index.php?type=faq&mod=430

    I know no one defends with offensive troops.. Was just saying if it were to happen the Romans would be better off..
    I think that MouthOfTGR is suggesting that you applie the same principle that you compared axe and imps, to axes and mace. You will find that mace have a better attack/build time than axe.

  6. #106

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by klebe View Post
    I posted that before you made that post. But seeing as you did, I'll take back what I said.
    No problem.. I understand.. Apology accepted..

    Quote Originally Posted by klebe View Post
    I think that MouthOfTGR is suggesting that you applie the same principle that you compared axe and imps, to axes and mace. You will find that mace have a better attack/build time than axe.
    Yes, that can be done.. Truthfully though, how many Teutons do you know that would ever do something like build Maces instead of Axes? I thought it would only be fair to use Axes as that is the norm..

  7. #107

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by napkin View Post
    Yes, that can be done.. Truthfully though, how many Teutons do you know that would ever do something like build Maces instead of Axes? I thought it would only be fair to use Axes as that is the norm..
    I believe Cossack was the main believer in maces being better. I haven't really seen too many teutons with mace hammers besides him.
    Quote Originally Posted by Kesetiaan View Post
    I believe the strength is not in the pixels on your computer. It is in your neuron cells in your brain.

  8. #108

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by napkin View Post
    Truthfully though, how many Teutons do you know that would ever do something like build Maces instead of Axes? I thought it would only be fair to use Axes as that is the norm..
    Quote Originally Posted by n00bPhobiA View Post
    I haven't really seen too many teutons with mace hammers besides him.
    http://www.kb-travian.de/show_kb_394...bc130aaae.html

  9. #109

    Default

    Okay.. That makes two I've seen now.
    Quote Originally Posted by Kesetiaan View Post
    I believe the strength is not in the pixels on your computer. It is in your neuron cells in your brain.

  10. #110

    Default

    All right, I can deal.. To maintain fairness:

    Maces = 8,498,360

    That brings Total Max Attack for Teutons to 16,274,360.

    Red is for Mods only- L.A
    Last edited by Lord Aslan; 05 Sep 2008 at 04:43 AM.

  11. #111

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by peachymcwiggins View Post
    onl post i wanted to reply to... i know its abit late... im not that noobish... and im a gaul so it wouldn't be a good idea would it. ^_^

    sorry for the huge back track.
    I'd hope your not, but the point I was trying ot make was that you can do the same thing he did so all is fair. Granted it wouldn't be a smart idea for you so I wouldn't suggest it as a serious option for you or anyone else.
    Quote Originally Posted by Kesetiaan View Post
    I believe the strength is not in the pixels on your computer. It is in your neuron cells in your brain.

  12. #112

    Default

    I had fixed a sitter for yesterday, had over 20 men, now when I got up I can see that he sent my troops for Reinforcement, and I only have 3 men left...

  13. #113
    Lord Aslan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,408

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Anatheria View Post
    I had fixed a sitter for yesterday, had over 20 men, now when I got up I can see that he sent my troops for Reinforcement, and I only have 3 men left...
    Start again...

    What's the last question you would want me to ask in this sig?
    Here it is:
    What's the purpose of life?

  14. #114

    Default

    Yeah, Ill have to.

  15. #115

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by napkin View Post
    Red is for Mods only- L.A
    Where is that rule posted? Must have missed it somehow..

    *cry* But I like Red

    If it really is a rule though, I have red in a few other posts of mine.. My apologies for that..
    Last edited by guywho; 05 Sep 2008 at 10:02 AM.

  16. #116

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by n00bPhobiA View Post
    I believe Cossack was the main believer in maces being better. I haven't really seen too many teutons with mace hammers besides him.
    Its less about believing. They are better. Simple math.

    But of course they cost aubergineloads of crop, so most players won´t build them or at least, like cossack, mix them with axes.
    cogito ergo cata

  17. #117

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MouthOfTGR View Post
    Its less about believing. They are better. Simple math.

    But of course they cost aubergineloads of crop, so most players won´t build them or at least, like cossack, mix them with axes.
    It really depends on your play style. If you build WW army, axe is better, you simply can't support as many mace as you could build. You could get a friend to help with crop, but 2 large axe armies is better than 1 huge mace army for sure, because then catapults becomes the limiting factor.

  18. #118

    Default

    Good answer Rain

  19. #119
    Lord Aslan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,408

    Default

    Please we've had this argument before- over 20 pages if i remember correct, with rediculous depth and calculations- looking at this from all angles... lets not have it again if possible?

    What's the last question you would want me to ask in this sig?
    Here it is:
    What's the purpose of life?

  20. #120
    Groggers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Southampton
    Posts
    1,832

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lord Aslan View Post
    Please we've had this argument before- over 20 pages if i remember correct, with rediculous depth and calculations- looking at this from all angles... lets not have it again if possible?
    Yes, and what was the outcome?
    Just for clarification.
    Teuton's were mathematically proven to be the more attacking tribe.

Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst ... 4567 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •