Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 115

Thread: WW time

  1. #1
    Mrs. Fantastic


    Prolific MemberProlific MemberProlific MemberProlific MemberProlific Member Ryder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Somerset
    Posts
    2,846

    Default WW time

    Seeing as Fox are trying a new tactic of clearing their WW at the same time of artefacts i thought we could have a WW thread?

    They can't even keep hold of a U.Diet artefact, no idea how they intend on keeping hold of a WWV.

    What a waste of troops at this stage of the game.
    Server 2, Round 4
    Server 3, Round 8
    Server 5, Round 8

    Current Servers;
    Com4 - IGN;Casper
    Uk5 - Gjenganger

  2. #2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ryder View Post
    Seeing as Fox are trying a new tactic of clearing their WW at the same time of artefacts i thought we could have a WW thread?

    They can't even keep hold of a U.Diet artefact, no idea how they intend on keeping hold of a WWV.

    What a waste of troops at this stage of the game.
    So, based on your writings, i guess you are not from FOX, and don't have any reports or any other informations?

    And waste of troops... Could be a "deleter" or what do they need troops for anyways in NE?

  3. #3

    Default

    If it was a deleter, fair game. But I have it from some players within the alliance that FOX is un-organized and lacks good leadership.
    Plus it looks like it was cleared by Punch and Nomad, both of whom don't show any signs of deletion any time soon. They also kind of look like a pair of players who came to the server together, settled in the sticks, and only happened to join an alliance. Meaning they would only have passing loyalty to the alliance and would do whatever they felt like doing(including clearing a WW without any plans for it).

    Just my two cents.
    Uk1- Cool Runnings
    Uk2- Black Mamba
    Uk4- Ser Lowe

    ~Steve

  4. #4
    Mrs. Fantastic


    Prolific MemberProlific MemberProlific MemberProlific MemberProlific Member Ryder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Somerset
    Posts
    2,846

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve991 View Post
    If it was a deleter, fair game. But I have it from some players within the alliance that FOX is un-organized and lacks good leadership.
    I've heard that, numerous times, and I'm not even on the server! #jokealliance
    Server 2, Round 4
    Server 3, Round 8
    Server 5, Round 8

    Current Servers;
    Com4 - IGN;Casper
    Uk5 - Gjenganger

  5. #5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve991 View Post
    If it was a deleter, fair game. But I have it from some players within the alliance that FOX is un-organized and lacks good leadership.
    Plus it looks like it was cleared by Punch and Nomad, both of whom don't show any signs of deletion any time soon. They also kind of look like a pair of players who came to the server together, settled in the sticks, and only happened to join an alliance. Meaning they would only have passing loyalty to the alliance and would do whatever they felt like doing(including clearing a WW without any plans for it).

    Just my two cents.
    True, it doesn't look like they are deleting. I have no knowledge of the FOX alliance, but again.. They haven't lost any troops so far in the game, so losing their first now isn't that bad. But if they are un-coordinated and stuff they got bigger problems i guess... This server is getting a bit boring, everybody just joining SWM for a easy win, nobody puts up a fight. ZzZzZz

  6. #6
    New Poster Craickeen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Sad planet called Earth
    Posts
    37

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ryder View Post
    I've heard that, numerous times, and I'm not even on the server! #jokealliance
    Really?! Numerous times! Was that back in the day...all I've heard are positive reports..in fact I was on the same server when they won..not such the underdogs as was first thought. As for Steve 's ramblings, second hand information without back up reports just comes across as sour grapes quite frankly...lose a few troops did you lol

    I look forward to seeing how well organised they are over the coming months but suffice to say they've got balls taking a WW so early...method in their madness? Might use that two cents to buy yourself some popcorn and pull up a chair eh.

  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Craickeen View Post
    Might use that two cents to buy yourself some popcorn and pull up a chair eh.



    From what I hear he might as well, he has no troops left

    http://travian-reports.net/us/report/283632560b7
    http://travian-reports.net/us/report/283631cf4e0
    http://www.travian-reports.net/us/report/283627cbbe2

    8)

    or is this who bananamanana means is deleting


  8. #8

    Default

    Haha yes those are all mine, no point in keeping a couple K off troops in cap when im not planning on rebuilding that hammer? And "Steve's ramblings" come straight from the mouth of one of your current players. Id quote it but the forums language filter would prevent me from doing so. Let just say your(I assume you are both FOX players) alliance was compared unfavorably with excrement on par with that found in the underworld. And also, I quote "It is a disgrace".

    This from one of your top(like really top) players lol
    Uk1- Cool Runnings
    Uk2- Black Mamba
    Uk4- Ser Lowe

    ~Steve

  9. #9
    Mrs. Fantastic


    Prolific MemberProlific MemberProlific MemberProlific MemberProlific Member Ryder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Somerset
    Posts
    2,846

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Craickeen View Post
    Really?! Numerous times! Was that back in the day...all I've heard are positive reports..in fact I was on the same server when they won..not such the underdogs as was first thought.
    Swm have won 2servers, it didn't make them any less terrible last round when the famous SOUTH WEST meta were forced to move and support a NW WW. The same applies here - Fox may of won a round once, but doesn't make them decent on this one.
    Server 2, Round 4
    Server 3, Round 8
    Server 5, Round 8

    Current Servers;
    Com4 - IGN;Casper
    Uk5 - Gjenganger

  10. #10
    New Poster Craickeen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Sad planet called Earth
    Posts
    37

    Cool

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve991 View Post
    Id quote it but the forums language filter would prevent me from doing so. Let just say your(I assume you are both FOX players) alliance was compared unfavorably with excrement on par with that found in the underworld. And also, I quote "It is a disgrace".

    This from one of your top(like really top) players lol
    Yes dear, course it was. As for your assumption, best you don't try that again ya might hurt yourself

  11. #11

    Default

    Has anyone considered that these Foxes might have taken that WW today on purpose? Just before a 3 day ceasefire. Plenty of time to build it up and defend it. With nothing we can do about it.
    Last edited by MOD LMT; 25 Mar 2016 at 10:32 PM. Reason: Intentional spelling mistake - fuxes instead of foxes

  12. #12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Craickeen View Post
    Yes dear, course it was. As for your assumption, best you don't try that again ya might hurt yourself
    I could screenshot and PM you the quote if you like?

    And if you are not in FOX, then you're just being a forum cheerleader for them I guess?
    Uk1- Cool Runnings
    Uk2- Black Mamba
    Uk4- Ser Lowe

    ~Steve

  13. #13

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve991 View Post
    I could screenshot and PM you the quote if you like?

    And if you are not in FOX, then you're just being a forum cheerleader for them I guess?
    Don't keep up is the dark. Screenshot and imgur it to all of us!

    Haven't played any travian since 3.5 - when is it normal to take a WW village?

    Has anyone considered that these Foxes might have taken that WW today on purpose? Just before a 3 day ceasefire. Plenty of time to build it up and defend it. With nothing we can do about it.
    This sounds reasonable to me, what does the mighty online-warriors say to this?

  14. #14
    Mrs. Fantastic


    Prolific MemberProlific MemberProlific MemberProlific MemberProlific Member Ryder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Somerset
    Posts
    2,846

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bananamanana View Post
    Don't keep up is the dark. Screenshot and imgur it to all of us!

    Haven't played any travian since 3.5 - when is it normal to take a WW village?
    you need 2 weeks ideally before plans are out to build it up where you need it, you could extend to 3 weeks just to be sure.



    Quote Originally Posted by bananamanana View Post
    This sounds reasonable to me, what does the mighty online-warriors say to this?
    We understand it was taken on purpose - but don't see much benefit of using the ceasefire to protect it

    At the end of the day it is now another target you need to protect. You couldn't protect the most valuable artefact, now your defence is going to be thinned even more.

    If you're not going for WW and wanted some off points, fair enough, but i dont think that's the case...
    Server 2, Round 4
    Server 3, Round 8
    Server 5, Round 8

    Current Servers;
    Com4 - IGN;Casper
    Uk5 - Gjenganger

  15. #15
    MemberMember
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Lancashire
    Posts
    245

    Default

    They're a young alliance needing some guidance, but they are enthusiastic and have a good team spirit

  16. #16

    Default

    I could screenshot and PM you the quote if you like?
    Still waiting

    now your defence is going to be thinned even more
    not by your troops though eh, (server stalker alert) Thins hammers to I guess on the up side.

    They're a young alliance needing some guidance, but they are enthusiastic and have a good team spirit
    The forum rules on the use of expletives prevent me from providing the deserved answer to this post so I'll join steve in some of his , he has so much.

  17. #17
    Active MemberActive MemberActive Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    in the bed all day
    Posts
    898

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bananamanana View Post
    Don't keep up is the dark. Screenshot and imgur it to all of us!

    Haven't played any travian since 3.5 - when is it normal to take a WW village?



    This sounds reasonable to me, what does the mighty online-warriors say to this?
    like ryder said a ww is taken from natars close to plans release... I would say 1 month before plans are released time in which you build your infra set suplies and specialised storage villas by said ww and as soon as you get the plan and is active you fire up ww.

    why 1 month before and not now? simple... by then you have sorted your quad and have a good base of deff to make sure enemies will not going to chief it or smash it to bits which now is a nice juicy target where they need to stretch their deff ... add this to their artefacts, capitals, non cap hammers and will give enemies an extra tool to work with.

    this being said so far they did ok in settling croppers, growing villas (accounts), taking artefacts... I would not say they are bad, but opposite and they are going to make an worthy opponent
    UK 5 - Hawkeye
    UK 19 - The 3 stooges

  18. #18
    New Poster Craickeen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Sad planet called Earth
    Posts
    37

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve991 View Post
    I could screenshot and PM you the quote if you like?

    And if you are not in FOX, then you're just being a forum cheerleader for them I guess?
    Is that an educated guess or another self inflicted stab in the dark ? Might wanna lie down after that sunshine.

    As for the rest...where in the rules does it state a WW can't be taken early? Yes of course it was deliberate only an idiot would think otherwise (cue the haters) it's a little unusual maybe but makes for a far more interesting end game.
    Not going for WW?! <<< I actually despair :/

  19. #19

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Craickeen View Post
    but makes for a far more interesting end game.
    It really doesn't affect end game, with 3 weeks a ww will have just as much infra as this ww will have with months of prep time. Like Sharkyl said, what this really does is gives opposing alliances another high value target to chief/cata thoughout the server.
    Uk1- Cool Runnings
    Uk2- Black Mamba
    Uk4- Ser Lowe

    ~Steve

  20. #20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve991 View Post
    I could screenshot and PM you the quote if you like?
    Been a lot of 'likes' for posting the screenshot. Still waiting...

Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •